Labour says Universal Credit forces people into destitution

Sedgemoor Labour Leader Mick Lerry  "Universal Credit is not working"
Sedgemoor Labour Leader Mick Lerry “Universal Credit is not working”

A damning report on the chaotic implementation of Universal Credit in part of Somerset  says claimants are being forced to use food banks to survive and are running up rent arrears as they wait for claims to be handled. The report highlights the problems faced by people struggling to deal with the online system and says there is inadequate support for the most vulnerable. Labour says Universal Credit is not working and people are being forced into destitution.

Universal Credit replaced other benefits for all claimants in Sedgemoor this summer. The district is a pilot area, before Universal Credit is implemented nationally. The impact has been monitored by the district council, Citizens Advice Sedgemoor and Digilink – an organisation that helps people with online access. Their joint report makes disturbing reading.  The CAB found:

  • Long delays in payment are forcing people to rely on food banks to survive
  • Many claimants face “digital exclusion” – with no internet access they struggle to make claims and are not being told they can claim in other ways
  • Clients without bank accounts are frozen out
  • During the waiting time for claims to be paid, claimants are running up rent arrears. When the first payment comes it is often used to pay the rent, leaving nothing for living costs
  • Processes are unclear and clients are receiving conflicting information from Job Centre Plus.

Revelations come as new Ken Loach film hits out at Tory attitude to benefit system.
Revelations come as new Ken Loach film hits out at Tory attitude to benefit system.

Sedgemoor on the frontline

Sedgemoor Council has been on the front line of dealing with Universal Credit problems, because for the first time claimants’ housing costs are being dealt with under a national system. Benefits staff at Sedgemoor say:

  • There is a lack of understanding of the severity of some claimants’ circumstances and inadequate support for the most vulnerable.
  • Extra work is needed with tenants to prevent them going into arrears
  • Call centres are failing by providing inadequate anwers and explanations.
  • The policy of the scheme is set centrally, yet solutions at a local level are needed and there is inadequate funding.

Digilink has been running sessions to provide residents with access to and support in using the internet. It says:

  • The most vulnerable 15-20% in society are really struggling through a lack of confidence
  • Even with support, clients cannot become “digitally fluent” overnight
  • Clients are being “pushed from pillar to post” and do not understand why they’re filling things out or what the end result will be
  • As a result, Digilink has seen an increase in frustrated clients and there are concerns about the impact on their emotional well-being.

Case Studies show UC is not working

Labour's shadow health secretary Debbie Abrahams has been sent a copy of the report
Labour’s shadow  Secretary of State for DWP  Debbie Abrahams has been sent a copy of the report

Cllr Mick Lerry, Leader of the Labour Group on Sedgemoor Council, said: “I welcome the work undertaken by Sedgemoor District Council, to highlight the impact of the roll out of Universal Credit in the district. The evidence shows that Universal Credit is not supporting the most vulnerable people and the inadequate administration of the programme is forcing many into debt and reliance on loan sharks and food banks. Case studies show that the roll out of UC is not working and the Department of Work and Pensions must understand how the people in need are being forced into destitution. I have sent the report to Debbie Abrahams, Labour Shadow Secretary of State for DWP, so that she is aware of what is happening to people locally and can challenge the Government, with the evidence in the report”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Rees
Mark Rees
7 years ago

Both my partner and myself are on UC. Both under ‘ESA’ conditions – my partner has just had an operation and could be fit for work in six months to a year and I am, unfortunately, still at the ‘diagnostic’ stage and could be under benefits long term. We were not kept waiting too long for our first payment but it wasn’t enough (we are in rental arrears and we are not sure why as no one has the answers within the system) but we have been told we are not going to get any more. So we repay arrears out of our living allowance. While we were waiting for a payment from UC, we had to fall back on the UC loan scheme. This helped short term but repayments are calculated at £90 per month which also must come out of the living allowance. This is severe and restricts us badly. We also have to endure monthly payments which means a few weeks after payment the money has run out. We have to borrow to buy basics (we stock up as best we can from discount freezer supermarkets but the basics like bread and milk has to be bought daily for freshness) and repay from our living allowance which, of course, leaves less in the kitty so you know you are going to have to borrow more…. Also, under UC we feel that their calculations are less than if you claim ESA and housing benefit (plus other claimable benefits) separately. We feel, that after years of contributing to the system in taxes (we are both in our late forties and have worked all our adult lives), that we are entitled to be treated with a bit of respect and fairness. We feel the general attitude is we are scrounging, an accusation we strongly deny.

Find your ward using the SCC ward finder

Privacy Policy

To read our Privacy Policy and GDPR compliance statement click here.